September 13, 2018
Blog, Apps & Games
September 13, 2018
99 of 107 people found the following review helpful
Too Biased to Bank, July 15, 2014
By Everyone’s_a_critic (USA) –
Verified Purchase(What’s this?)
This review is from: Too Big To Fail (Prime Video)
Hello. Is it worth the time to view this film? YES. Is this film an unbiased portrayal of what happened to the US financial system in 2008? NO.
Too Big To Fail is an entertaining drama, BUT it is just that, a drama, not a documentary. You cannot take everything you see in this film to the bank. The movies made about the financial crisis fall into one of two categories; reenactment drama / documentary. Be aware which category the movies you choose to watch regarding this event fall into. This reenactment is well acted (a blessing as well as a curse), it paints a picture of who some of the key players were -during the crisis but not necessarily leading up to the crisis- and it describes a few of the elements that triggered the events (though the actual explanation of what created the crisis is lacking). But when unrecorded conversations that took place behind closed doors are scripted by someone who wasn’t there, and character attributes are assigned to actors playing key people in positions of great power, truth sometimes becomes a casualty of drama, not to mention any (well intentioned or otherwise) agenda by the book author / film maker that creeps in. Watching this production is an exercise of separating the wheat from the chaff.
If you want to view an actual documentary that depicts the events as they occurred check out “Inside Job“. This production interviews the actual people working in the industry at the time (or at least the ones willing to appear on camera, which in and of itself is telling).
To further illustrate the point let’s take one player as an example; Treasury Secretary Henry [Hank] Paulson. In Too Big to Fail, Hank Paulson is portrayed as a caring, compassionate man caught up in events he had no hand in creating. Inside Job, however, airs actual video tape of Paulson speaking, and the impression one gets from noting his behavior on camera is a bit different from the Too Big To Fail characterization. Aging but still handsome actor William Hurt portrays an integrous, nurturing Hank Paulson in Too Big. Is that the real Paulson? Did Paulson’s tenure at investment bank Goldman Sachs not contribute to the crisis? We have some quotes from Wiki that tend to counter the Hank Paulson portrayed in Too Big:
1) In April 2007, he delivered an upbeat assessment of the economy, saying growth was healthy and the housing market was nearing a turnaround. “All the signs I look at” show “the housing market is at or near the bottom,” Paulson said in a speech to a business group in New York. The U.S. economy is “very healthy” and “robust,” Paulson said.
2) On August 10, 2008, Secretary Paulson told NBC’s Meet the Press that he had no plans to inject any capital into Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. On September 7, 2008, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went into conservatorship.
3) Time Magazine has Paulson as one of the “25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis”.
None of this comes out in Too Big.
Inside Job further points out that Paulson supported lifting the leverage limits on Investment banks (which made the problem far worse), as well as resisting regulation of the issuance of insurance policies (CDSs) that broke the back of AIG (the institution which had to be bailed out by the Federal government). I would add that Paulson is on record in support of a major law put on the books known as the ‘Dodd-Frank’ bill. What does this mean? It is pretty much agreed that what enabled the 2008 financial crisis was the repeal of a post 1930s depression law that for over half a century had kept banks from doing precisely what they did that caused the crisis (along with unregulated derivatives). The law was referred to as Glass-Steagall and was repealed in 1999. You can draw a direct line from the repeal of Glass-Steagall to the near failure of the US financial system in 2008.
Yet rather than simply put Glass-Steagall back on the books, law makers passed the monstrously sized, never read by any politician, Dodd-Frank bill instead. Result? Today the financial system is more highly leveraged than it was in 2008. Nothing has been fixed under Dodd-Frank. So what’s the deal with Paulson? Is he a professional liar, inept, deluded, ill-educated, corrupt? I don’t know. It’s just that to answer that question we need more than what Too Big gives us. I would recommend watching ‘Hank: Five Years From the Brink‘, an interview based documentary focusing exclusively on Hank Paulson’s point of view on the crisis. His demeanor tends to reflect what William Hurt put forth in Too Big, and he convincingly…
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Entertaining look at 2008 Financial Crisis, but not really “Date Night” fare…. (unless you’re both economists), November 12, 2015
By T Keith Abramowski –
Good drama about the 2008 Financial Crisis, particularly the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the effects from that up until the TARP legislation passed. Starting in the summer after the collapse of Bear Sterns, this film focuses on the eventual collapse of Lehman Brothers as a lens toward viewing the wider Financial Meltdown. It touches on other events during that time in passing (Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, Countrywide, Merrill Lynch, etc.), but spends most of its energy on Lehman and the Treasury Department’s attempt to solve the crisis, and then shifts its focus to the Treasury’s attempts to stabilize the markets.In all a good, entertaining film that doesn’t get too deep into the esoteric machinations that brought about the Crisis.
That last would be one point of contention I had about this film. It kept everything on a fairly simplistic level and accepting the “Financial pundits’ thesis” ultimately placing the blame on the homeowners and American people for causing the crisis, rather than the overleveaged Wall St. banks. This is like saying “Those innocent Wall St. bankers were swindled by those savvy, cutthroat Average Joe Americans who took those Wall St. Bankers for a ride.” And that’s ridiculuous. As one who saw the crisis coming remarked after the collapse, “That idea assumes that 5 million average Americans all decided to lie on their mortgage applications and were all so good at doing it that they fooled the Wall St. bankers at places like Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch. And if that’s the case, then those people should be working on Wall St., rather than those bankers.”
Still all in all an enjoyable film with a good cast. Some famous faces (William Hurt, Paul Giamatti, Bill Pullman, James Woods) and many great character actors you will recognize but not immediately know (Topher Grace, Michael O’Keefe, John Heard). But they all do a decent job.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
A really well portrayed movie!, August 10, 2016
By David –
I didn’t think this was going to be that good and was expecting a half told dramatization. This was really well played out and showed the blowback and effects of the 2008 banking crises in full. It showed the hard choices that had to be made by many of the key players and people who affected our lives.With the presidential election in the upcoming future, it is important you keep events like this in mind so that you know why it is important you have someone who can make the right choice and decision in a hard time even if it isn’t the best choice.We here the term “Too bog to fail” a lot now with banks and wall street being in the news every week and more and more people looking at what happend in 2008 and what could have been differently.The only thing that was difficult about this movie was keeping some of the banks straight and remebering who they where due to the fact they where introduced once and didn’t have role that left you connecting with them one a personal level or anything.Also if you liked this movie you would probaly als olike the movie The Big Short which shows a different side of the 2008 crises.
Copyright © 2019 TopSellers. All rights reserved.